


Quoting from a VMS Access Control List Editor manual:Īccess control list entries could grant or deny access to multiple system-manager defined groups of users, and/or write entries to security logs, and/or propagate to files created in subsidiary directories (when applied to files in the filesystem). I suspect that Windows/NTFS inherited the extensive ACL capability from VMS, which is both good and bad. Directories under ext4 can only be defragmented in offline mode (i.e. Lastly NTFS can be fully defragmented while ext4 can only defragment individual files. NTFS can become slower but that's the price you pay for its super advanced ACL and various logging/reporting/transactions/mirroring/compression/encryption features. The only thing that goes for ext4 is its performance while working with a ton of small files. NTFS is in an order magnitude more advanced than ext4. Your knowledge of NTFS is extremely lacking. under Linux) allows to use pretty much everything except / and NUL. If anything NTFS is a lot more advanced than ext4 in this regard and then by default NTFS3 in POSIX mode (i.e.
Diskkeeper price code#
Mixing both without caution leads to all sorts of interesting problems with obscurely-named files.At the same time NTFS filenames can be up to 255 UTF-16 code units while ext4 is limited to 255 bytes. The allowed character set for filenames stored using NTFS is a subset of the character set for ext4.
